JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 27 No. 2 287-298
© 1986 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shore, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hendee, W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shore, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hendee, W. R.

Radiopharmaceutical Dosage Seclection for Pediatric Nuclear Medicine

Richard M. Shore and William R. Hendee

Departments of Pediatrics and Radiology, The Children's Hospital and Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado

Correspondence: For reprints contact: Richard M. Shore, MD, Dept. of Radiology, The University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53792.

ABSTRACT

To identify the most rational method for adjusting adult radiopharmaceutical dosages for children, four methods of dosage computation were examined from the perspectives of diagnostic adequacy and rediation absorbed dose. For static imaging, information density is the most important factor in study quality, and edjustment of dosage by body weight (Wt) for "thick" organs, and body surface area (BSA) for "thin" organs is recommended. Compared with adults, small children receive less radiation exposure if rediopharmaceutical dosages are adjusted by Wt, and slightly greater exposure if dosages are edjusted by BSA. For dynamic imaging studies, dosage requirements are governed by the spatial resolution needed for region of interest assignment, and the statistical reliability of the time-activity data. For dynamic renal imaging, renograms of similar quality are obtained if dosages are adjusted by height (Ht).Dynamic cardiac studies might appear to require dosages even larger than those adjusted by Ht which would result in higher radiation absorbed doses to pediatric patients. However, smaller dosages can be used in children by prolonging the imaging time and accepting lower temporal resolution. Dosage requirements for dynamic studies depend on which physiologic characteristics are measured from the tirne-activity data. Since the measurements of some characteristics demand higher count rates than others, dosage requirements ultimately depend on which measurements are clinically necessary. Close attention to the factors that determine these requirements may yield significant reduction in dosages, and thus in radiation exposure, for patients of all ages.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
R.-A. Muller, R. D. Rothermel, M. E. Behen, O. Muzik, T. J. Mangner, and H. T. Chugani
Differential Patterns of Language and Motor Reorganization Following Early Left Hemisphere Lesion: A PET Study
Arch Neurol, August 1, 1998; 55(8): 1113 - 1119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1986 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.