JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 27 No. 11 1774-1781
© 1986 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, D. C.P.
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, G. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, D. C.P.
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, G. N.

Correlation of Radionuclide Imaging and Diagnostic Ultrasound in Scrotal Diseases

David C.P. Chen, Lawrence E. Holder and Gerson N. Kaplan

Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, The Union Memorial Hospital
Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions; Baltimore, Maryland

Correspondence: For reprints contact: David C.P. Chen, MD, Div. of Nuclear Medicine, University of Southern California, 1200 North State St., Los Angeles, CA 90033.

ABSTRACT

A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the comparative usefulness of scrotal ultrasound imaging (SU) and radionuclide scrotal imaging (RSI) in 46 patients. The final diagnosis included four late phase and one early testicular torsion (TT), 11 acute epididymitis (AE), four subacute epididymitis (SE), six malignant tumors, ten hydroceles or other cystic lesions, and ten miscellaneous lesions. In patients with scrotal pain, 3/4 with late phase TT were correctly diagnosed by SU, while one with early TT and 11/15 with AE or SE were not diagnosed. All of them were correctly diagnosed with RSI except one with scrotal cyst. SU was able to separate cystic masses (n = 10) from solid masses (n = 9), but could not separate malignant from benign lesions. RSI had difficulty in separating cystic from solid lesions. We concluded that SU is useful in patients with scrotal mass to separate solid from cystic lesions. However, SU is unable to differentiate acute epididymitis from early testicular torsion. Therefore, in patients with acute scrotal pain, RSI should still be the first study performed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ImagingHome page
D L. Cochlin
Acute testicular pain
Imaging, October 1, 2005; 17(2): 91 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1986 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.