HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fearnow, E. C. Articles by Coleman, R. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fearnow, E. C., III Articles by Coleman, R. E.

Factors Affecting Ventricular Volumes Determined by a Count-Based Equilibrium Method

Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Correspondence: For reprints contact: R. E. Coleman, MD, Box 3949, Duke University Med. Ctr., Durham, NC 27710.

ABSTRACT

Using a ^99mTc-filled source ("ventricle") in an elliptical torso phantom, we analyzed the effect of source depth, region of interest (ROI) size, background concentration and source shape on volumes determined by an attenuation-corrected count-based equilibrium method. The calculated volume of a 96 cc sphere decreased linearly from 103 to 82 cc with increasing depth from 4 to 18 cm [vol = –1.48 · depth (cm) + 109, r = 0.99]. The calculated volume of the same sphere imaged at a depth of 9 cm increased from 98 to 117 cc with ROI sizes increasing from 161 to 1,369 pixels (1 pixel = 0.17 cm²). With increasing background concentration from 0–2 µCi/ml calculated volumes decreased from 95 to 85 cc (vol = –5.3 · background concentration from 0-2 (µCi/ml) + 95, r = 0.97). However, with correction for over-subtraction of background, increasing background activity caused no decrease in calculated volume (mean = 95 cc, s.d. = 1). Calculated volumes for the sphere and various cylinders were accurate, while those for cones were up to 37% lower for actual volumes ranging from 56–608 cc. This study demonstrates that multiple factors produce variability in count-based determination of phantom volumes. A careful consideration of the interaction of these factors with the edge-detection and computational algorithms is required.