HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Saenger, E. L. Articles by McDevitt, R. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Saenger, E. L. Articles by McDevitt, R. A.

Determination of Clinical Efficacy: Nuclear Medicine as Applied to Lung Scanning

Eugene L. Saenger Radioisotope Laboratory, Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio

Correspondence: For reprints contact: Eugene L. Saenger, MD, Eugene L. Saenger Radioisotope Laboratory, Mail Location #577, University of Cincinnati Hospitals, Cincinnati, OH 45267.

ABSTRACT

This paper describes a Society of Nuclear Medicine sponsored study of 2,023 patients which compares two methods, logistic regression (LR) and entropy minimax pattern detection (EMPD), to evaluate efficacy. Lung scans, used in determining or excluding a diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE), were utilized to create the data set. The LR analysis, presented here, shows that lung scan findings have significant influence on the referring physician's diagnostic thinking. Models were developed for the probability of a signout diagnosis of PE, and equal patient groups tested the validity of these regression equations. Individual models developed on each patient group yielded similar results. This analysis shows that the lung scan results affect the therapeutic management of the patients in a beneficial direction. A comparison of the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of EMPD and LR was done. EMPD predicts a signout diagnosis on only 41% of cases before lung scan and 71% after lung scan; LR provides a prediction of the signout diagnosis on 100% of cases. An advantage of EMPD is that it does not require prior probability estimates. However, LR uses this estimate, thus incorporating intuitive knowledge not evaluated by EMPD.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. B. Lusted The Clearing "Haze": A View from My Window Med Decis Making, June 1, 1991; 11(2): 76 - 87. [PDF]