|
|
||||||||
Nuclear Medicine Service and Vascular Surgery Laboratory, VA Medical Center
University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
Correspondence: For reprints contact: Naomi Alazraki, MD, VA Medical Center (115), 500 Foothill Dr., Salt Lake City, UT 84148.
ABSTRACT
The delayed images of the four-phase 99mTc phosphonate bone scan are compared with the delayed images of the three-phase study in patients with diabetes mellitus and/or peripheral vascular disease and suspected osteomyelitis. Three-phase bone imaging includes an immediate postinjection redionuclide angiogram, a blood-pool image, and delayed static images to 7 hr. The four-phase study adds a 24-hr static image. The scan is positive for osteomyelitis if images show progressively increasing lesion to background activity ratios over time. The results of analyzing 21 three- and four-phase bone scans in 17 patients were correlated with clinical course, cultures, and/or x-rays, gallium scans, and CT scans. The accuracy of four-phase bone imaging for diagnosing osteomyelitis was 85%; for three phase, 80%. Sensitivity for four phase was 80%; specificity was 87%. Sensitivity for three phase was 100%; specificity was 73%. Since over all accuracy of the four-phase study is slightly better than three phase, in these patients with diabetes mellitus and/or peripheral vascular disease, the addition of a 24-hr image, creating a four-phase bone scan, is recommended.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. S. Ballani, F. A. Al-Huda, H. A. Khan, S. Al-Mohannadi, H. Mahmood, and F. Al-Enezi The Value of Quantitative Uptake of 99mTc-MDP and 99mTc-HMPAO White Blood Cells in Detecting Osteomyelitis in Violated Peripheral Bones J. Nucl. Med. Technol., June 1, 2007; 35(2): 91 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. P. Ledermann, M. E. Schweitzer, and W. B. Morrison Nonenhancing Tissue on MR Imaging of Pedal Infection: Characterization of Necrotic Tissue and Associated Limitations for Diagnosis of Osteomyelitis and Abscess Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2002; 178(1): 215 - 222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |