JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 26 No. 7 711-717
© 1985 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alazraki, N.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alazraki, N.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, A., Jr.

Value of a 24-Hour Image (Four-Phase Bone Scan) in Assessing Osteomyelitis in Patients with Peripheral Vascular Disease

Naomi Alazraki, David Dries, Fred Datz, Peter Lawrence, Ed Greenberg and Andrew Taylor, Jr.

Nuclear Medicine Service and Vascular Surgery Laboratory, VA Medical Center
University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah

Correspondence: For reprints contact: Naomi Alazraki, MD, VA Medical Center (115), 500 Foothill Dr., Salt Lake City, UT 84148.

ABSTRACT

The delayed images of the four-phase 99mTc phosphonate bone scan are compared with the delayed images of the three-phase study in patients with diabetes mellitus and/or peripheral vascular disease and suspected osteomyelitis. Three-phase bone imaging includes an immediate postinjection redionuclide angiogram, a blood-pool image, and delayed static images to 7 hr. The four-phase study adds a 24-hr static image. The scan is positive for osteomyelitis if images show progressively increasing lesion to background activity ratios over time. The results of analyzing 21 three- and four-phase bone scans in 17 patients were correlated with clinical course, cultures, and/or x-rays, gallium scans, and CT scans. The accuracy of four-phase bone imaging for diagnosing osteomyelitis was 85%; for three phase, 80%. Sensitivity for four phase was 80%; specificity was 87%. Sensitivity for three phase was 100%; specificity was 73%. Since over all accuracy of the four-phase study is slightly better than three phase, in these patients with diabetes mellitus and/or peripheral vascular disease, the addition of a 24-hr image, creating a four-phase bone scan, is recommended.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nucl. Med. Technol.Home page
N. S. Ballani, F. A. Al-Huda, H. A. Khan, S. Al-Mohannadi, H. Mahmood, and F. Al-Enezi
The Value of Quantitative Uptake of 99mTc-MDP and 99mTc-HMPAO White Blood Cells in Detecting Osteomyelitis in Violated Peripheral Bones
J. Nucl. Med. Technol., June 1, 2007; 35(2): 91 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. P. Ledermann, M. E. Schweitzer, and W. B. Morrison
Nonenhancing Tissue on MR Imaging of Pedal Infection: Characterization of Necrotic Tissue and Associated Limitations for Diagnosis of Osteomyelitis and Abscess
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2002; 178(1): 215 - 222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1985 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.