HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lancaster, J. L. Articles by Blumhardt, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lancaster, J. L. Articles by Blumhardt, R.

Effect of Errors in Reangulation on Planar and Tomographic Thallium-201 Washout Profile Curves

Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine Division, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Texas

Correspondence: For reprints contact: Jack L. Lancaster, PhD, Dept. of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine Div. The University of Texas HSCSA, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr., San Antonio, TX 78284.

ABSTRACT

Cardiac phantom studies were performed with and without a defect present to test the hypothesis that myocardial ²⁰¹Tl quantitative circumferential washout profile curves calculated from planar and rotating slant hole (RSH)collimator tomographic images are equally affected by errors in axial repositioning. Simulated stress images were acquired with the long axis of the phantom perpendicular to the camera surface and redistribution images were acquired to represent 50% ²⁰¹Tl washout with axial repositioning errors relative to the stress position ranging from 0 to 20° in 5° increments. There was a decrease in the ²⁰¹Tl washout profile curves compared to that expected (50%) in the wall tilted away from the camera surface, and a reciprocal increase in the ²⁰¹Tl washout profile curves in the wall tilted towards the camera surface for both imaging techniques whether a lesion was present or not. This effect became more pronounced as the error in axial repositioning was increased for both the planar (p<0.001) and the RSH tomographic (p<0.001) techniques. However, the deviation of the ²⁰¹Tl washout profile curves from that expected (50%) was greater for the planar imaging technique with or without a lesion (p<0.05 to 0.001). Thus, we conclude that ²⁰¹Tl quantitative circumferential washout profile curves calculated using this tomographic imaging technique are less affected by errors in axial repositioning than those calculated using an equivalent projection by standard planar imaging methods. These data emphasize the importance which must be placed on the repositioning of patients to obtain valid ²⁰¹Tl washout profile curves for the detection and localization of coronary artery disease.

FOOTNOTES

^* Present address: Dept. of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI.