JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 25 No. 6 679-687
© 1984 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raff, U.
Right arrow Articles by Hendee, W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Raff, U.
Right arrow Articles by Hendee, W. R.

Practicality of NEMA Performance Specification Measurements for User-Based Acceptance Testing and Routine Quality Assurance

U. Raff, V. M. Spitzer and W. R. Hendee

University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado

Correspondence: For reprints contact: Ulrich Raff, PhD, Radiological Sciences, Div. of Nucl. Med., University of Colorado Health Sci. Center, Denver, CO 80262.

ABSTRACT

National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) performance specifications provide the only standardized and traceable measurements of scintillation-camera performance that are widely accepted by manufacturers. The NEMA publication describing the performance specifications suggests that elaborate equipment beyond a standard imaging computer is required for the measurements. For this reason the tests are currently unsuitable for both user-based acceptance testing and dally quality assurance. We have implemented five of the eight NEMA performance measurements as routine quality-assurance procedures on our computerized scintillation cameras. In addition, we have shown that seven of the eight NEMA measurements can be performed in a manner traceable to NEMA, with energy resolution as the single exception. With a standard imaging computer, NEMA phantom, and minor modification to NEMA collection and analysis constraints, we have analyzed images for intrinsic uniformity, resolution, linearity, and multiple-window spatial registration as well as for system spatial resolution both with and without scatter.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1984 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.