JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 25 No. 2 188-196
© 1984 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Witherspoon, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Witherspoon, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, S. S.

Evaluation of an Immunoextraction Procedure for the Estimation of Free Thyroxine Concentration

Lynn R. Witherspoon, Stanton E. Shuler and Susan S. Gilbert

Ochsner Clinic, and Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, New Orleans, Louisiana

Correspondence: For reprints contact: Lynn Witherspoon, MD, Ochsner Clinic, 1514 Jefferson Highway, New Orleans, LA 70121.

ABSTRACT

We have examined the performance of a commercial free-thyroxine assay in which a radiolabeled T4 derivative permits the competitive quantitation of extracted T4 in the presence of serum proteins.* After the total T4 pool had been radiolabeled with either I-123 T4 or I-131 T4, the solid-phase antibody was found to be associated with 4–8% of the total T4 present in the assay tube. Of this, 15–60% was displaceable (antibody-bound). The assay estimated free T4 to be 0.6–1.8 ng/dl in euthyroid patients, and distinguished them from hyperthyroid (sensitivity 91%) and hypothyroid patients (sensitivity 91%) without apparent TBG dependence. In patients with severe nonthyroidal illnesses, the assay correctly quantitated a reduced extracted mass in some. In other patients, however, the assay results were inappropriately lower than the actual extracted mass, in agreement with the FTI but not with the measurements of free T4 by dialysis. This assay appears to produce clinically appropriate results in most patients. In some nonthyroidally ill patients however, the indicated free T4 is spuriously low.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1984 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.