HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jaszczak, R. J. Articles by Coleman, R. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jaszczak, R. J. Articles by Coleman, R. E.

Lesion Detection with Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Compared with Conventional Imaging

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina and Siemens Gammasonics, Inc., Des Plaines, Illinois

Correspondence: For reprints contact: Ronald J. Jaszczak, PhD, P.O. Box 3949, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.

ABSTRACT

We have evaluated analytically and experimentally the effectiveness of both conventional nuclear medicine imaging and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging to detect small photon-deficient areas (approximately the size of the system's resolution) within a relatively uniform background. The experimental model is based on the Tc-99m sulfur colloid study of the liver. The experimental data were obtained from a liver phantom containing two small photon deficient areas, nominally 1 and 1.5 cm in diameter. The liver phantom was placed in a water-filled Alderson body phantom and scanned with the cold defects located both centrally and peripherally. Lesion image contrast for both conventional and SPECT imaging is proportional to the lesion uptake ratio and is degraded by the system's finite spatial resolution and Compton-scattered photons. However, for conventional imaging the contrast is significantly degraded by the effect of radionuclide superposition (as modified by attenuation), while for SPECT imaging the contrast is essentially independent of these effects. This results in a significant increase in lesion-to-background contrast with SPECT as compared with conventional imaging. The measured SPECT image contrasts for the 1- and 1.5-cm areas of low uptake averaged more than five times the measured image contrasts for the conventional system.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. H. Farncombe, H. C. Gifford, M. V. Narayanan, P. H. Pretorius, E. C. Frey, and M. A. King Assessment of Scatter Compensation Strategies for 67Ga SPECT Using Numerical Observers and Human LROC Studies J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2004; 45(5): 802 - 812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. P. Tornai, J. E. Bowsher, R. J. Jaszczak, B. C. Pieper, K. L. Greer, P. H. Hardenbergh, and R. E. Coleman Mammotomography with Pinhole Incomplete Circular Orbit SPECT J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2003; 44(4): 583 - 593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. W. Groch and W. D. Erwin SPECT in the Year 2000: Basic Principles J. Nucl. Med. Technol., December 1, 2000; 28(4): 233 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. D. Naegeli, E. M. Cordasco, G. Meden, J. K. O'Donnell, W. J. MacIntyre, and W. Dishner Lymphangiomyomatosis Newer Concepts in Pathogenesis and Management Case Reports Angiology, November 1, 1990; 41(11): 957 - 963. [Abstract] [PDF]