JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 22 No. 12 1069-1074
© 1981 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koral, K. F.
Right arrow Articles by Knoll, G. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koral, K. F.
Right arrow Articles by Knoll, G. F.

A Measure of Anger-Camera Linearity: Results with and without a Corrector

Kenneth F. Koral, Mark E. Schrader and Glenn F. Knoll

Medical Data Systems, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Correspondence: For reprints contact: Kenneth F. Koral, PhD, Medical Data Systems, 2311 Green Rd., Ann Arbor, MI 48105.

ABSTRACT

A method for measuring the X and Y linearity of an Anger camera coupled to a computer is presented. It has similarities to, and differences from, the method recommended by the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). Test images are taken through a lead plate with parallel and equally spaced slots, and the locations of the lines in the images are fitted by least-squares with an equation that allows for slight misalignment. Discrepancies from the fit are calculated and displayed as a distribution over the camera field. The maximum and average discrepancies are tabulated. The field of view that is of interest is selectable within the analysis program.

Among four large-field-of-view uncorrected cameras, three 37-tube types (two measured using Tc-99m and one with Au-195) show a similar degree of nonlinearity. However, the maximum and average discrepancies from linearity for a 61-tube prototype camera, measured using Tc-99m over a 15-in. field of view, are 40% of those for the other three. For the four cameras, an event-shifting on-line corrector with best-case sampling improves linearity by an average factor of 5.5, including both 15- and 11.25-in. fields of view.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1981 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.