JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 21 No. 2 161-164
© 1980 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Waxman, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Waxman, A. D.

Clinical and Parametric Evaluation of Three Large-Field-of-View Cameras

Dennis R. Chapman, Michael B. Brachman, Doina E. Tanasescu, Ralph S. Wolfstein, Daniel S. Berman and Alan D. Waxman

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California

Correspondence: For reprints contact: Dennis Chapman, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90048.

ABSTRACT

This paper compares the clinical and parametric performance, at 140 keV, of three different large-field cameras in a single institution. The instruments tested were the Ohio Nuclear 410, Picker 4/15, and Searle LFOV. There were differences noted in both qualitative and quantitative measurements of physical performance, but these differences could not be demonstrated in clinical studies.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1980 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.