JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 19 No. 9 1074-1077
© 1978 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hauser, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Gottschalk, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hauser, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Gottschalk, A.

Comparison of the Anger Tomographic Scanner and the 15-in. Scintillation Camera for Gallium Imaging

Mary F. Hauser* and Alexander Gottschalk

Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut

Correspondence: For reprints contact: Alexander Gottschalk, Dept. of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St., New Haven, CT 06510.

ABSTRACT

The Anger longitudinal emission multiplane tomoscanner and a 15-in. Anger camera with multipeak spectroscopic capability were compared in a series of 51 patients. The tomoscanner was preferred in 49%, the camera in 12%, and 39% were equivalent. The tomoscanner preference is statistically significant (p < .025). These data support the conclusion that the Anger multiplane tomographic scanner is the instrument of choice for gallium-67 imaging.

FOOTNOTES

* Present Address: The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21205.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1978 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.