JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 19 No. 5 545-552
© 1978 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guldberg, C.
Right arrow Articles by Rossing, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guldberg, C.
Right arrow Articles by Rossing, N.

Comparing the Performance of Two Gamma Cameras under High Counting Rates: Principles and Practice

Claus Guldberg and Niels Rossing

The Finsen Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark

Correspondence: For reprints contact: Claus Guldberg, Dept. of Clinical Physiology, The Finsen Institute, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø.

ABSTRACT

The performance of two large Anger cameras at high counting rates was compared, and the principles for measuring the relevant parameters, especially deadtime loss and coincidence artifacts, are discussed.

The results demonstrate the importance of the following factors: modern pulse-shaping circuitry with short paralyzable deadtime, an anti-pileup circuit, and uniform energy information within the field of view, which requires separate summing matrices for energy and position.

Elaborate testing of the specifications should be carried out before purchase of a gamma camera.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1978 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.