JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 18 No. 9 919-924
© 1977 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rollo, F. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martin, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rollo, F. D.

Estimation of Thyroid Depth and Correction for I-123 Uptake Measurements

Peter M. Martin and F. David Rollo

Veterans Administration Hospital, San Francisco, California

Correspondence: For reprints contact: Peter M. Martin, Veterans Administration Hospital, 4150 Clement St., San Francisco, CA 94121.

ABSTRACT

A new technique has been developed to correct I-123 uptake measurements for the effect of gland depth. The method uses the effect of differential tissue absorption and/or scatter of photons of different energies, and measures the ratio of counts of the primary I-123 emission to the counts of the tellurium K shell x-ray to determine a depth-correction factor. A comparison of this new method against three previously reported methods indicates that the present method provides the most sensitive index of gland depth. The method is sensitive to depth changes, is not significantly dependent on detector distance (p > 0.05) for distances greater than 18 cm, and is not dependent on gland size (p > 0.25), within the range 20–40 ml. In a group of 40 patients, the ORINS phantom method was found to underestimate the mean gland depth by about 1 cm, thereby causing an average uptake error of 23%. The application of the depth-correction factor was found to change the interpretation of uptake estimates in approximately 10% of the cases in this limited series.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1977 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.