JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 18 No. 2 180-182
© 1977 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Twieg, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Nardizzi, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Twieg, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Nardizzi, L. R.

Effects of Noise on the Determination of Ejection Fraction from Left Ventricular Time-Activity Curves

D. B. Twieg, E. M. Stokely, R. W. Parkey, J. T. Willerson and L. R. Nardizzi

Southern Methodist University, and Southwestern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas

Correspondence: For reprints contact: D. B. Twieg, Dept. of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75235.

ABSTRACT

The effects of Poisson noise on three estimates of ejection fraction made from left-ventricular time-activity curves have been investigated. All three methods are based on a sinusoidal model of left-ventricular volume changes. The first, developed by Schelbert et al., overestimates the ejection fraction for low-activity levels and low ejection fractions. The second estimate, which is merely a first-order correction for the contribution of Poisson noise to the first estimate, appears to be more accurate when both estimators are applied to simulated time-activity curves, and the resulting ejection fractions are compared. A third, "maximum likelihood" estimator, when applied to the same data, is apparently more accurate than the first two.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1977 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.