JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 16 No. 12 1137-1143
© 1975 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Subramanian, G.
Right arrow Articles by Duxbury, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Subramanian, G.
Right arrow Articles by Duxbury, C. E.

Technetium-99m-Labeled Stannous Imidodiphosphate, A New Radiodiagnostic Agent for Bone Scanning: Comparison with Other 99mTc Complexes

G. Subramanian, J. G. McAfee, R. J. Blair, M. Rosenstreich, M. Coco and C. E. Duxbury

Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse, New York

Correspondence: For reprints contact: G. Subramanian, Div. of Nuclear Medicine, Dept. of Radiology, Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse, N.Y. 13210.

ABSTRACT

Imidodiphosphate (IDP) is an analog of pyrophosphate and diphosphonate, with a P-N-P bond instead of P-O-P or P-C-P. We have labeled IDP with 99mTc quantitatively (98%) using stannous ions as the reducing/complexing agent in a freeze-dried kit form. Radiobioassay of this compound was carried out in rabbits and the results were compared with those of eight other Tc-labeled bone-imaging agents, using the performance of simultaneously administered 85Sr as a reference standard. The 99mTc-IDP concentrated 20% higher in the bone, and its soft-tissue and blood levels were lower than with 85Sr. By comparison, the concentrations in the bone of the other 99mTc agents were 20% less than that of 85Sr. Regarding blood levels, Tc-IDP performed worse than the Tc-diphosphonate but better than the pyrophosphate and the other technetium complexes. Scintillation camera images of 99mTc-IDP in both rabbits and dogs showed excellent details of the skeleton. In a preliminary human study, images with 99mTc-IDP were somewhat inferior to those comparably procured with 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate, but count rates with the IDP complex were about twice those with the MDP compound. Because of its better bone uptake, however, it is suggested that 99mTc-IDP may be clinically useful in spite of its relatively slow blood clearance.

Key Words: IDP, imidodiphosphate • MDP, methylene diphosphonate • HEDP, ethylenehydroxydiphosphonate • AEDP, aminoethylenediphosphonate • HMDTMP, hexamethylenediaminotetra(methylene phosphonate) • EDTMP, ethylenediaminotetra(methylene phosphonate) • DTPMP, diethylenetriaminopenta(methylene phosphonate)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1975 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.