JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 14 No. 11 846-849
© 1973 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murthy, M. S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Datta, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murthy, M. S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Datta, S.

Revised Parameters for Use in Loevinger's Beta Point-Source Dose-Distribution Function

M. S. S. Murthy, G. Venkataraman and Shiv Datta

Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Bombay, India

Correspondence: For reprints contact: G. Venkataram, Division of Radiation Protection, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Bombay-400 085, India.

ABSTRACT

Even though extensive data in tabular form on beta point-source dose-distribution in water and air have been made available by Cross and Berger, Loevinger's beta point-source dose-distribution function is the only equation available in an analytical form that can be used to calculate the dose from extended sources. However, constants employed in this equation were based on scanty experimental data which were available in the 1950s. it was seen that Loevinger's original parameters give fairly accurate dose distribution values for beta emitters of maximum energy less than 1 MeV, while for high energy emitters the dose values using the original constants were less by about 20% compared with Cross's values. Hence, the parameters in Loevinger's equation have been reevaluated for high-energy beta emitters.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JOURNAL OF THE ICRUHome page
REFERENCES
J. ICRU, December 1, 2004; 4(2): 165 - 175.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1973 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.