JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 13 No. 3 191-195
© 1972 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knowles, L. G.
Right arrow Articles by Schulz, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knowles, L. G.
Right arrow Articles by Schulz, A. G.

Effect of Line Spacing and Ratemeter Averaging on Lesion Detection

L. G. Knowles, E. F. Hart and A. G. Schulz

The Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory, Silver Spring, Maryland
The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland

Correspondence: For reprints contact: A. G. Schulz, The Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory, 8621 Georgia Ave., Silver Spring, Md. 20910.

ABSTRACT

Spatial integration resulting from proper adjustment of line spacing values appears to aid in the detection of focal lesions in photorecords of rectilinear scanning. Similar improvement possibilities exist with independent ratemeter smoothing. There is good correlation between the gains in detection and in the corresponding integration lengths associated with averaging along and perpendicular to the path of the scan. For the specific lesion sizes in this study detection performance with a line spacing of 0.32 cm is 10–15% better than that at 0.16 cm. Wider line spacing did not give further improvement.

An additional improvement of 10% in detecting small focal lesions is obtained by spatial integration along the path of the scan. The best space constant value is about 0.3 cm. For the size lesions studied, unidirectional scanning provided no change in detectabiity compared to normal bidirectional scanning. Scalloping is not a significant factor for this problem for space constant values up to 0.5 cm.

Where post-scan data processing is not available or in use rectilinear scanning instruments should offer the clinician independent variable time smoothing so that the counting rate may be smoothed before recording without the complex interplay of contrast enhancement that now exists in many of the older designs.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1972 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.