JNM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 11 No. 2 81-84
© 1970 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strauss, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Blaufox, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strauss, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Blaufox, M. D.

Estimation of Residual Urine and Urine Flow Rates Without Urethral Catheterization

Bernard S. Strauss and M. Donald Blaufox

Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York

Correspondence: For reprints contact: M. Donald Blaufox, Dept. of Medicine—Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, 1300 Morris Park Ave., Bronx, N.Y. 10461.

ABSTRACT

Thirty patients (20 with obstructive uropathy and 10 normal) have been studied to evaluate the use of radionuclides for the estimation of residual urine and urine flow rates without urethral catheterization. The residual urine was estimated from the radioactivity detected in the bladder area 45 min or longer after the intravenous injection of 131I-orthoiodohippurate. The mean residual volume determined in 20 patients with obstructive uropathy by the isotopic method was 77 ± 17 ml (s.e.). Catheterization performed immediately after the isotope study revealed a residual of 80 ± 18 ml (s.e.). This difference is not significant (0.3 < p < 0.4). None of the 10 normal subjects had a significant residual by the isotopic method; they were not catheterized. The mean urine flow rate in the normal subjects was 16.1 ml/sec ± 8.3 (s.d.) and 5.9 ml/sec ± 3.3 (s.d.) in the abnormal patients (p < 0.01). The method described is accurate and reliable and should be used in preference to urethral catheterization to determine residual urine volume and urine flow rates in patients with lower urinary tract obstruction.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nucl. Med. Technol.Home page
R. D. Folks, E. V. Garcia, and A. T. Taylor
Development and Prospective Evaluation of an Automated Software System for Quality Control of Quantitative 99mTc-MAG3 Renal Studies
J. Nucl. Med. Technol., March 1, 2007; 35(1): 27 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. P. Esteves, A. Taylor, A. Manatunga, R. D. Folks, M. Krishnan, and E. V. Garcia
99mTc-MAG3 Renography: Normal Values for MAG3 Clearance and Curve Parameters, Excretory Parameters, and Residual Urine Volume.
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): W610 - W617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Copyright © 1970 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine.